Active Entries
- 1: 5 things make a post
- 2: What I'm (tentatively) thinking for MyNoWri"Mo":
- 3: 1 of my relatively recent Tumblr posts: Thoughts on why Harry Potter books were Such a Phenomenon
- 4: 5 things make a post
- 5: I know I seemed to drop off the face of Dreamwidth for a couple of weeks...
- 6: 5 things make a post
- 7: The current kerfuffle over NaNoWriMo has stirred up thoughts and feelings
- 8: I've gone and dug myself into an angry mood.
Style Credit
- Style: Poppy Fields for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2014-08-20 05:53 pm (UTC)As I remember it, one school said that each version of the Doctor is actually a replacement of the one that came before -- a swap-out with a parallel universe, and that the previous Time Lord ceases to exist, on a fundamental level. This is clearly the school of thought RTD belongs to (Not only did he have Ten whining "I don't wanna go," he also had Nine tell Rose: "...it means I'm not going to see you again," instead of the other way around). Whereas Moffat belongs to the other school of thought: that regeneration is a natural, biological, process, only slightly different (although more complex) than the ordinary aging we humans experience.
And after seeing that fan made trailer, it became crystal clear to me that the main reason Clara's reaction to the Doctor's regen is so similar to Rose's in "The Christmas Invasion" (Even though it makes no sense, plotwise), is that it gives Moffat his one chance to rebut that whole whiny "What will I do? My Doctor's Gawwwn!" shpiel.
And since he has the Doctor say exactly what I wished he would have said to Rose in TCI, I'd forgive a plot hole the size of Belgium...