Halloween-themed Signal Boost and PSA:
Oct. 25th, 2011 02:02 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I'm collecting images from history of physically and mentally disabled, and their struggles against "The Normals" for a project I'm working on. And in my insomnia-driven quest Last Night/This Morning, I came across the following tidbit (from this website: The Sheredes Project: Spitalbrook Hospital):
Now, for the record: No, I don't believe the early makers of Grade B Zombie movies realized they were making entertainment based on historical instances of actual human rights violations. They probably thought the idea of "Living Dead" just sounded cool, and let their imaginations run wild.
But, you know. It's something for you to think about, when you're deciding what sort of entertainment to hoot, screech and laugh over, next week.
(Quote)
The Living Dead
In the Middle Ages, if a person developed leprosy, they would be declared legally dead and lose all their possessions. They would have to leave their family, and go to live with other lepers in a place like the hospital at Spitalbrook. In Medieval times, this would have been outside the village of Hoddesdon.
Lepers were given special clothes, a begging bowl, and a bell or wooden clapper, so they could be clearly seen and to warn other people to keep their distance. They were given these in a ceremony that was modelled on the service for the burial of the dead and, in many places, the leper was actually required to stand in an open grave while the ritual, that marked them as outcasts from society, was performed above their head.
(Unquote)
Now, for the record: No, I don't believe the early makers of Grade B Zombie movies realized they were making entertainment based on historical instances of actual human rights violations. They probably thought the idea of "Living Dead" just sounded cool, and let their imaginations run wild.
But, you know. It's something for you to think about, when you're deciding what sort of entertainment to hoot, screech and laugh over, next week.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-27 03:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-27 03:20 am (UTC)Yeah, I guess this is one case where monster=disability is more than just a metaphorical category.
And I'm thinking maybe I should edit this post. I really did not mean to imply that "They didn't know, but now, you do, so don't watch those movies!"
My "but, well, you know" was more of a verbal shrug -- just putting the thought out there...
no subject
Date: 2011-10-27 03:11 pm (UTC)Don't concern yourself with the "but, well, you know" — I assume the best when reading your work (since you so often display it).
Although I can relate to a reflex hypersensitivity when it comes to posting: exhibit A would be the posts I haven't made this month.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-28 05:55 pm (UTC)Also, while I'm not certain how much the tradition you cited has played into the development of the pop zombie, even the Haitian inspiration brings up questions of appropriation and screwing up folklore in a depressing manner.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-28 06:39 pm (UTC)I'd love to see a documentary on the history of how lepers fit into society (or not) through the ages, and I'd love to see it titled (something like): "Days of the Living Dead"
And no, I don't want to condemn the entire Zombie-range of pop culture, either. But yes, it would be good to include more nuanced thinking around our whole notions of monsters and horror.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-29 11:51 pm (UTC)I vaguely remembering an explanation for people with communicable diseases being given death and burial rites before they were considered too infectious (according to ideas of physical/spiritual danger localised in time and space, obv) to be ministerable to at close quarters by an apparently healthy (to localised definitions) priest. So they were supposedly being given a spiritual benefit sooner that would otherwise be denied to them later. The main perceived disadvantage was that if the ill person subsequently sinned then they had no remedy within the earthly church and would have to take their chances at post-mortem judgment.
Also, blah blah Haiti too, obv.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-29 11:58 pm (UTC)The dead don't have to pay taxes, etc.
Still...
no subject
Date: 2011-10-30 12:08 am (UTC)Good point, although I'm cynical enough to think that "infectious" people not being required to work in the local Lord's fields or turn out for militia duty was probably more of a benefit for their former neighbours (and now I have images of the zombies in Ankh-Morpork's City Watch with their fingers falling off on duty &c.).
no subject
Date: 2011-10-30 02:07 am (UTC)...Well, okay. That's "nice," I guess... But it would be better to have a fully accessible public transit system, so I wouldn't need to own a specially adapted van just to live in this community.
But the State ways its options and decides waiving my taxes is less of a social burden than actually acting on platitude that I am fully human...