Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: 5 things make a post
- 2: What I'm (tentatively) thinking for MyNoWri"Mo":
- 3: 1 of my relatively recent Tumblr posts: Thoughts on why Harry Potter books were Such a Phenomenon
- 4: 5 things make a post
- 5: I know I seemed to drop off the face of Dreamwidth for a couple of weeks...
- 6: 5 things make a post
- 7: The current kerfuffle over NaNoWriMo has stirred up thoughts and feelings
Style Credit
- Style: Poppy Fields for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags

no subject
Date: 2012-07-04 05:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-04 09:18 pm (UTC)I love coming up with monsters (or drawing the monsters that come to me). I love mixing the seemingly incongruous into a perfectly seamless Whole. I think my favorite monster is still this one, though, which I drew a couple of years ago:
(monster with the body of a snail, head of a gryphon, and tail of a dragon).
I even got that image printed onto a shirt (the one I happen to be wearing, now). The slogan reads: "In a Class of my Own (and Phylum, too)" ^_^
no subject
Date: 2012-07-04 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-05 12:21 am (UTC)Even though I haven't gone back and read the thesis "When a Knight meets a Dragon-Maiden" in depth, since I started writing my poem responses to it (I should! It's on my to-read list), one phrase the writer uses in reference to monsters (I think quoting Medieval writers/philosophers) is "The difficult middles" -- those precise points where things that shouldn't match up, do -- like where the Chimera's "goat head" grows from the middle of her lion-back (Photo of Chimera in Bronze, from Wikipedia), or where a gryphon's eagle legs grow from the lion's torso, or the point where a satyr goes from goat to human. As soon as I saw that phrase, a little bell rang in my head that this is exactly why monsters have always fascinated me...
...And just as I start a meandering ramble into the land of "teal deer," I realize this probably deserves a journal entry all its own.
Meanwhile, there's a more mundane reason why this creature has the fur pattern it does: there is an "art bunny" (kissing cousin to the plot bunny) hopping around in my head right now for making more YouTube storytelling videos with still pictures (a few might be August Art projects-- and I might want to use my monster drawings as "actors." Since my monsters are "wild animals," it struck me as rather silly to dress them in clothes, a la Beatrix Potter or Walt Disney, but on the other hand, I could very well get my videos flagged as "inappropriate" if I drew a human-like torso without covering it in something. So I gave it fur... and I "just happened" to make the silhouette of the fur match up with human clothing styles...
no subject
Date: 2012-07-05 12:33 am (UTC)Have pinpointed the reason for my enjoyment of the monster's ankles: furry legs with hairless feet is the way many humans look (or would naturally look) but there's a taboo against depicting them that way. I like this monster because it has hands and arms like mine, and legs and feet like mine, but its face is nothing like mine except in its expression, which means I can identify with it more strongly than with a character whose face is... hmmm... human-as-others-see-it and unlike my self-image. I hope I make any sense at all here!
no subject
Date: 2012-07-05 03:26 am (UTC)So often, deliberately anthropomorphic cartoon animals seem to be drawn with an exaggerated fill-in-the-blank formula (substituting iconic versions human features for animal ones), with the goal of making the character appealing to one emotion.
And what you end up with is a "flat" character that has no feel of emotional reality.