Is it these octopodes, or the squeeing (human) marine biologists?
Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: 5 things make a post
- 2: What I'm (tentatively) thinking for MyNoWri"Mo":
- 3: 1 of my relatively recent Tumblr posts: Thoughts on why Harry Potter books were Such a Phenomenon
- 4: 5 things make a post
- 5: I know I seemed to drop off the face of Dreamwidth for a couple of weeks...
- 6: 5 things make a post
- 7: The current kerfuffle over NaNoWriMo has stirred up thoughts and feelings
Style Credit
- Style: Poppy Fields for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2016-01-24 04:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-01-24 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-01-25 08:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-01-25 11:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-01-25 05:08 pm (UTC)If nobody has made a plush version of that, I spy a missed opportunity.
no subject
Date: 2016-01-25 05:26 pm (UTC)A quick Web search reveals that plush versions do exist. But the couple that I did find were not very accurate -- giving them a nose/mouth/snout between their eyes (when octopus beaks are actually at the center of their tentacles).
no subject
Date: 2016-01-25 05:50 pm (UTC)...which wouldn't be easy to pattern at all, but I bet it could be done.
no subject
Date: 2016-01-25 06:19 pm (UTC)Here's another video that shows one swimming, and you can see what the underside looks like: https://youtu.be/far3piBfV8E
no subject
Date: 2016-01-25 08:02 pm (UTC)Ohhh! They're awesome-looking underneath, although I feel like I've just peeked up somebody's skirt. Maybe the webbing bit should go on top of the tentacles - cute and fuzzy on top, with those... filaments? underneath. Like..
'()' <- head and ears
==== <- webby bit between tentacles
||v|| <- tentacles stitched up to webbing?
I do tend to overcomplicate, but now I'm trying to figure out how to make it adorable and still accurate, hah.
no subject
Date: 2016-01-25 08:17 pm (UTC)If I do, it'll be in a separate post. :-)