capri0mni: A black Skull & Crossbones with the Online Disability Pride Flag as a background (squee)
Personally, I prefer Geek to Nerd. "Geek" traces back to at least 16th Century English, and originally (before it meant "Side show 'freak') meant "Village idiot."

In this modern world, of the Internet and global mass media, I think of "village idiot" as the person or persons who have little knowledge of the "Water Cooler Chat" subjects such as which X celebrity has fallen off the A-list, or what sports season it is, or whatever else is the publicly endorsed subject of enthusiasm. So when we find ourselves standing near the water cooler, or waiting for the elevator, we really have nothing to add to the conversation, and so we appear idiotic.

Meanwhile, the things we are interested in? We love them unabashedly, and we want to share what we love with others, and we have no interest in playing the cynic or hipster in order to gain acceptance or avoid teasing. That gleeful enthusiasm is what makes a geek, imnsho. And so, our "rattling on" about whatever has sparked our imagination comes across to our "fellow villagers" as inane babbling.

But the truth is: The world is cool. And it's full of so many more things to be enthusiastic about besides the latest pretty body. And life is too short, and too full of real angst and anger and energy-wasting problems to willfully waste any more energy to pretend to be aloof to the things that are actually closest to our heart.

Today [personal profile] meloukhia posted in her journal about making pie. And she decorated it with pi. And that reminded me of a video I found on YouTube, posted on Pi Day (March 14) about how "Pi is Wrong" (philosophically speaking, as a mathematical tool, not incorrect), and the vid-maker illustrated her points by baking pies. I went back to watch it again. It was amusing, but what really made me happy was this vid:

I'm sorry I don't have a transcript, yet, but she talks so fast, and she doodles so fast, it's hard for me to get my ears and head around it. But I hope to come up with something passable in the not-too-distant future.

And in the meantime, even though math is not "my thing," I can't help but find her glee contagious (and she's given me ART!Ideas). And that's the way it is with all geeks, I think.
capri0mni: A black Skull & Crossbones with the Online Disability Pride Flag as a background (Absolutely!)
For people on my f'list who I Know are Fans.

So, last night, I was watching Craig Ferguson.

And in the closing segment ("What did we learn on the show tonight, Craig?"), he announced that since the "Lost Cold Open" was leaked to the Internets, CBS officials went ahead and got the rights to the song.

And... And... And:

They will use it as the cold open later this week, when Alex Kingston (a.k.a. "River Song") is a guest on the show.

(Cue massive grinning from one [personal profile] capri0mni.)

---
I thought you guys would like to know this.

...
Even if you are not a fan of Moffat, Smith, Kingston, or any of the newest Doctor Who team, and even though Craig Ferguson does not have the audience or exposure of The Tonight Show with Jay Leno or David Letterman, this has got to increase interest in the entire Doctor Who series in the United States (both old and new), and maybe increase the liklihood that we'll get DVD releases in a timely manner.

(It's so cute; Craig has kept a little model TARDIS on his desk, up front, right in camera shot, ever since Matt Smith's appearance. D'awww.)
capri0mni: A black Skull & Crossbones with the Online Disability Pride Flag as a background (Default)
So -- remember my post, yesterday, squeeing about the discoveries of Exoplanets in the last decade, and how some of those scientists (notably Steve Vogt, et alia) now calculate the chance of a star having a life supporting planet to be in the range of one in a few tens, instead of one in a few millions?

Well, this morning, I woke up to hear this report coming at me through my radio:

Sci-Fi to fact: Planet Hunters find worlds like Earth (text transcript, with a link to the audio -- 4 min 43 sec).

Pay attention, Moffat, et alia: keep up with the quarries alien planets for stories. We wants them. Yes we do, Precious.
capri0mni: A black Skull & Crossbones with the Online Disability Pride Flag as a background (Absolutely!)
So, yesterday, I got into a discussion with [personal profile] vilakins in [personal profile] kerravonsen's reaction post to the recent Doctor Who Christmas Special, especially the line: "Christmas is always in winter."

ORLY?! asked all those Who fans who watched the Christmas Special after a Summertime Christmas celebration, for reals, right here on Earth. And [profile] vilikins and I launched into a long, tangential, conversation about what sort of planetary factors go into what sorts of festivals the intelligent beings might celebrate, and what happens when you superimpose histories and politics on top of that.

And what about planets without any axial tilt?



And that's the reason I love the show, and the fans it attracts. The very premise and the format of the show prompts these sorts of questions, and gets all sort of juicy conversations going. My brain feeds on Juicy Conversations (and chocolate).

And late last night, that discussion reawakened a set of memories in my brain about two very real, nonfiction exoplanets that have been discovered just within the five years, both orbiting the same red dwarf star 20.5 lightyears from us: Gliese 581c and Gliese 581g (two wikipedia articles).

Both planets appear to be Earth-like, and to have conditions suitable to sustain the presence of liquid water and thick atmospheres that would moderate the extreme variations in the planets' surface temperatures. Therefore, these planets are more likely then not to support the presence of life as we'd recognize it.

Both planets are probably also without much, if any axial tilt. And both (like our own moon) are very likely tidally locked, so that the length of a day equals the length of a year. So: yeah -- right in our own galatic backyard, two planets that have both a "north" and a "south" but also planets where "north and south" probably wouldn't mean much, culturally speaking, if any cultures live there (but "Light, Dark and In-Between" would).

What I take away from all this:

Doods!! I mean Dooooods!!! We've only started our search for exoplanets fifteen years ago, and just four years in, we already found a planet that looks comfortable. And just three years after that, we find another one in the same system.

And our sample size is really small: just 420 out of the billions of stars in our galaxy. And we only picked those because they're close to us, and relatively easy for us to observe.

As Stephen Vogt, et alia (the authors of the paper in which discovery of Gliese 581g was announced) put it:

(Quote)
This detection, coupled with statistics of the incompleteness of present-day precision RV surveys for volume-limited samples of stars in the immediate solar neighborhood suggests that eta_Earth could well be on the order of a few tens of percent.
(unquote)


Dooods!!!eleventy!!!one!!

Eleventy!

(squee)

And also: If, in our own solar system, if Mars also fostered life at some point in our planets' mutual history (even if it no longer does), than maybe two life-supporting planets per star system is also relatively common.

What sort of implications would that have in science fiction stories?

An interview with Steve Vogt, about the (unconfirmed, yet) discovery of planet "Gliese 581g" on YouTube (in September of this year)

His conclusion: "Learn to wrap your mind around the incredibleness of the Universe, and it will make you happy if you do that."

All together now (with the hand motions & dance, if you want):

"Intellect and Romance over brute force and cynicism!"
capri0mni: A black Skull & Crossbones with the Online Disability Pride Flag as a background (geek god)
This TimeLight Atomic Projection Clock with Color LCD from Oregon Scientific showed up in an email from Allegro Medical as a "daily living aid," presumably on the grounds that it's helpful for people who can't roll over in bed on their own, to check the time (even though it doesn't seem to have designed or marketed primarily as "assistive tech" by the manufacturer).

Meanwhile, Allegro Medical won't show the price of this item on their website until you place it in your cart. This is the reason they give:

(Begin quote)
Because our price on this item is lower than the manufacturer's suggested retail price, the manufacturer does not allow us to show you our price until you place the item in your shopping cart. Retailers like Allegro Medical have the legal right to sell products at prices we set. However, adding the item to your cart allows us to show you our lower price consistent with our promise of always offering you the lowest possible prices on the widest selection of medical supplies, medical equipment and life enhancing products.
(end quote)


Allegro's "Below Manufacturer's sugested retail" sale price? $97.99 (they claim the original list price is $145.99). The sale price offered on the manufacturer's own website? $59.95 (the actual original list price is $99.99).

It's this kind of thing that makes me suspicious of the argument that because the Disabled are such a small, isolated, "niche" market, we have to expect and meekly accept the high costs of everything we need.

The criminal thing (ethically, if not legally) is that this same group has, on average, a 66% unemployment rate (largely due to the bigotry of many employers), and increased daily living expenses for things like medicines and medical procedures, and they just don't have that much money to pay.

...

Okay, so maybe that was more than a smidge of anger.

Let me go back to the geek!squee: "ooooh! Atomic clock! With a changing color light display! And predicts the weather 12-24 hours in advance!"

My friends, we are living in the Future!
capri0mni: A black Skull & Crossbones with the Online Disability Pride Flag as a background (Default)
Well, kinda-sorta know, online, in a casual way. But still. And it's in the folk music catagory, so it won't be televised. But still.^ They're the ones in bold:

Category 68: Best Traditional Folk Album (Vocal or Instrumental.)

Cutting Loose
David Holt And Josh Goforth
[High Windy Audio]


Naked With Friends
Maura O'Connell
[Sugar Hill Records]


Polka Cola: Music That Refreshes
Jimmy Sturr And His Orchestra
[Starr Records]


Singing Through The Hard Times: A Tribute To Utah Phillips
(Various Artists)
Jacqui Morse, Kendall Morse & Dan Schatz, producers
[righteous babe records, inc.]
*


High Wide & Handsome: The Charlie Poole Project
Loudon Wainwright III
[2nd Story Sound Records]

^But it will be broadcast online, starting in a little over an hour.

*A few of the "various artists" are also peole I know, kinda-sorta online; we're all regulars of the same Internet forum. (Yay for Internet people!).

[ETA: here's the online .PDF of the Pre-broadcast schedule: http://www.grammy.com/files/pdf/52PreTel_web.pdf
"my" folks are listed as 49th in the schedule

here's the site for the Grammy's live:
http://www.grammy.com/live]
capri0mni: A black Skull & Crossbones with the Online Disability Pride Flag as a background (Default)
Q:

1) Have you ever been in a helicoptor?

2) What is the first Shakespeare play you read?

3) Anything exciting happening this weekend?

A:

1) No. My dad was an airline pilot (for Eastern) though, and for my sixth birthday, he invited me up into the cockpit for the landing of "his" DC 9.

2) I don't remember; I actually saw a performance of Shakespeare before I ever read him (on TV --one of that BBC series that was broadcast weekly on PBS in the 80s). I think that's why I got hooked. It was As You Like It.

This is the squeeful bit I wanted to tell you:

3) Some people I know, kinda-sorta, in a friendly way in passing, online, are up for a Grammy award, on Sunday. In the Folk Music catagory (so it won't be televised, but will be on the Web).

The specific details are posted here and here (Their album is the fourth album listed, the one with cover songs of Utah Philips' music). A few other people I also know, kinda-sorta, in a friendly way in passing, etc. are singers on the album.

The pre-televised Grammies (the only stuff I'm really interested in) can be seen online, this year (if you have nice broadband, that is) at Grammy.com/live starting at 1:00 p.m. pacific, 4:00 pm Eastern, 9:00 pm GMT, etc. (I do not know if they'll have a more detailed schedule up).

Profile

capri0mni: A black Skull & Crossbones with the Online Disability Pride Flag as a background (Default)
Ann

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
16171819202122
232425262728 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 1st, 2025 11:14 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios